![]() Image of QuickPick at work, note the accuracy scores and yes or no answers on the right.Īrtificial Lawyer asked the company why it had taken this approach, rather than seeking to allow users to input ‘free-form’ natural language questions into the system as people went along with a review? The reason is that this ‘answer-focused’ approach is more reliable, they said. Where the answers have come from is also then highlighted on the left of the screen in the contract text, so the reviewer can see the source. These results are then listed on the right side of the screen (see image below) along with confidence scores in terms of the accuracy of the answer. ![]() Using QuickPick you could ask something very direct such as ‘Is there a termination date?’ and get a yes/no answer, but also more complex questions such as: ‘Does assignment require consent? What exceptions to confidentiality exist? Or, what actions are covered under force majeure?’ With this approach, pre-set questions may be yes or no in response, or questions that will provide specific responses to most of the key things you would normally look for with that type of contract or use case. The genesis of QuickPick directly stemmed from a pain point they heard from their customers: how to take unstructured data in contracts and create more structure around it, the company said.įor example, a company doesn’t want to extract contract data and then have to sift through it to find if the located terms meet their playbook, as that slows the review process. It joins a growing number of companies providing a Q&A contract review capability. EBrevia has launched QuickPick, a contract analytics feature that can automatically provide answers to a selection of pre-set questions, speeding up the review process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |